Lepus, the Hare. Just South of Orion with its Ears on the Top-Right |
Search This Blog
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Lepus
Friday, November 19, 2010
Best Views in the Solar System
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Alkab or Iota Aurigae
Auriga labelled by Astrometry.Net! |
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Alkaid's Neighbors
I mentioned Vancouver's zenith star, Alkaid, a few posts ago. In and of itself Alkaid is not particularly remarkable, but two of its neighbours in sky are. Within a couple of degrees of Alkaid are two of the most beautiful galaxies in the firmament, M51 (The Whirlpool Galaxy) and M101 (The Pinwheel Galaxy). Here are some photos from the Hubble Space Telescope (NASA/ESA).
M51 - The interacting Whirlpool Galaxy |
M101 - The Pinwheel Galaxy |
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Algol
Algol in Perseus |
The more massive star of the pair is still on the main sequence, but the less massive one has already evolved to become a subgiant. This presents a paradox because usually more massive stars evolve faster. The solution is that Algol B has lost mass to Algol A. The current secondary star was at one time the more massive and as it evolved off the main sequence and swelled it lost mass to its companion and become the secondary star.
When a star loses mass to its partner, not only does the mass transfer change the stars themselves, it also changes their orbit. When the more massive star transfers mass to the less massive star, their masses come closer together, and also their orbit shrinks bringing the stars themselves closer to together. As you might imagine, this will encourage further mass transfer.
One would think that this process would end when the two stars had equal masses. Thereafter, further mass transfer would cause the orbit to grow. This is correct; however, the donor star could swell further (and even swell as it loses mass) so the mass may continue to flow from the less massive star to the more massive star, even though the orbit starts to grow again. This is probably what happened with Algol A and B. By the way there is also an Algol C that orbits around the other two stars with a period of nearly two years --- it is quite far away compared to the others. Its orbit would remain more or less the same in spite of the shenanigans of the other two stars.
Perhaps I will catch a fainter Algol in a subsequent photo --- I have a one in seven chance!
Monday, October 25, 2010
Almaaz or Epsilon Aurigae
Almaaz and Auriga |
In 2009 observations with the Spitzer infrared telescope have found evidence that the primary is post-asymptotic giant star (like Mira but further along -- its pulsation period is about 66 days, much shorter than Mira) and that the secondary is a B-star with a disk of material around it. The system is actually in eclipse right now from 2009 to 2011.
The American Association of Variable Stars (AAVSO) have made it a special target during the current eclipse and you can check out a light curve up to today at this link. Really Cool!
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Alkaid
The zenith star for Vancouver lies at the end of the handle of the Big Dipper, Alkaid (or Alcaid). It is actually brighter than its handle-lighting compatriot at the end of the Little Dipper, Polaris. Mirphak (α Per is a bit too far north) and Capella (α Aur is a bit too far south) come close, but Alkaid works best. Alkaid, also known as Benetnash, is just a smidgen over 100 light years from Earth. It is a star about six times the mass of the Sun, not massive enough to produce a supernova but still very short lived. It is still along the main sequence consuming hydrogen in its core and shining blue-white. It is otherwise relatively unremarkable.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Capella
Capella and the Helmet of Auriga |
The binary-binary star Capella is the bright dot at the top of the image. If you zoom it, you will see it is quite orange-yellow. The brighter pair of stars are two yellow giant stars (a bit less orange than the nearby giant Arcturus). The more massive of the two is slightly more evolved on the cusp of being called an orange giant. It has probably already begun combining helium to make carbon in its core. The second pair of stars are two red dwarfs about 10,000 AU from the first pair. The giants are a strong x-ray source about four orders of magnitude brighter than our Sun.
With these two giant stars orbiting so close to each other at about 100 million kilometers, they is a lot of action to look forward to, if we could only wait a few dozen million years as the envelopes of both stars swell to surround the entire binary. In the meantime, we can watch for the interactions of the strong winds from the two stars that possibly play a role in the x-ray emission from this first stellar x-ray source to be discovered.
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Mira
Mira and Much of Cetus |
It reaches its highest point in the sky around 2am, so it is understandable if you miss it this time around. It will be bright again in 11 months and will reach its high point around 4am -- maybe a bit more convenient.
Monday, October 18, 2010
Aldebaran
Aldebaran, the Hyades and the Pleiades |
A cool question to ask is whether we could detect planets orbiting these giant stars. Assef, Gaudi and Stanek (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...701.1616A) argue that although the duration of the transits is long (about 50 hours or longer) and the amplitude is small (less than one part per thousand), the systematics of the photometry can be kept under control that even one-meter telescopes could discover such transiting systems from the ground. From satellites such as Kepler, COROT and MOST the prospects are even better.
Friday, October 15, 2010
Rigel
Let's stick with Orion a bit longer. The star Rigel is usually the brightest in Orion (even though it is sometimes called β Ori). In fact Rigel is further from us that Betelgeuse, and it is indeed the brightest star within 1,000 light years of Earth. Rigel like Betelgeuse is a supergiant star, but it is blue rather than red. Rigel intersects my work because it too has been detected as a radio source, so it gives us an idea of which blue stars will be visible with the Square Kilometer Array. It turns out for various reasons that although Rigel and Betelgeuse are inherently much brighter, the stars like Arcturus are much better prospects for the Square Kilometer Array. Giant stars like Arcturus are much more common than supergiants, so the SKA should see lots of them even in the bulge of our Galaxy. The Wotjobaluk koori of southeastern Australia held that Rigel was the mother-in-law of Altair which explained why there are rarely seen in the sky together.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Betelgeuse
Orion with Betelgeuse at top left and Rigel at lower right |
Betelgeuse is a relatively close yet physically large star extended to a radius of a few AU (Mars's orbit), so the stellar disk of Betelgeuse has actually been resolved at visible wavelengths (like Altair) , and it is also a radio source (like Arcturus), that I used as an example to understand the radio emission from stars in the Galactic bulge and what might be seen with the Square Kilometer Array.
The photosphere of Betelgeuse appears to shift and pulsate, so it has been difficult to measure its distance using parallax. The theories of such giant stars is that the extended photosphere of such giants is convective with only a few cells (the Sun has thousands). The heat transport through the extended, tenuous photosphere is extremely inefficient, and the density is so low that it makes sense to call its atmosphere a hot vacuum. It has recently been discovered that this convective atmosphere efficiently generates a magnetic field (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A%26A...516L...2A).
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
The Planets Move
|
Jupiter and Uranus at 10 pm PDT on 4 October 2010 |
I shared a nice photo of Jupiter (and Uranus) from a few nights ago. I took another photo of the same area of sky last night. I have rotated both so that west is to the right and both have the same scale. It is quite obvious that Jupiter over the course of just two nights has moved closer to the 5.45-mag star on the right (20 Pisces). The length of the stellar stripes is very closer to 450 arcseconds (because Jupiter is along the celestial equator now), so you can figure out how far is has moved. It also has moved north a bit following the ecliptic. Less obvious is that the stripe at the top of the image has also moved west a bit too, so my claim that it is Uranus seems to hold water! Unfortunately, it was a bit cloudy and I shook the tripod at the beginning of the exposure, so the second photo isn't as nice. I try again soon.
Of course, none of this is surprising except for the fact that one could do so well with such simple equipment.
Saturday, October 2, 2010
Altair
When I went observing in Armenia in 1992, Armenia and Azerbaijan were fighting. Just south of the observatory was the border between Armenia and the Azeri exclave of Nakhchivan. Just to the east of the observatory was the exclave of the exclave, the village of Karki that had been captured by Armenia just a couple of months earlier in May 1992. Anyhow, one night mortars knocked out the power to the telescopes, cutting off the night's observing. I had been working through the day, so I was already asleep and I slept through the excitement.
The previous star I mentioned was Vega. Just across the Milky Way lies α Aquilae or Altair. Altair like Vega is a bright blue star. In fact it is almost a twin of Vega down to its rapid spin. The biggest difference is that we are looking at the equator of Altair more or less (while we see Vega's pole), so where Vega was brighter from our point of view than average, Altair is fainter. Altair is one of the few stars for which we have made a direct image using optical interferometers. It is also by far the smallest in angular size. Not surprisingly Altair is quite squished, as Vega is, but in the case of Altair our viewpoint is favourable actually to see the distortion. For Vega we can only infer the shape.
Here is a photo of the Eagle (Aquila) from tonight with Altair as the eye of the bird near the top of the image (just to the left of the word "Altair"). It is a 30-second exposure with an five-year-old digital camera.
Here is a photo of Jupiter and the Galilean moons (from left to right: Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto) taken a couple of minutes earlier. The planet Uranus is the blue stripe in top-left corner.
The previous star I mentioned was Vega. Just across the Milky Way lies α Aquilae or Altair. Altair like Vega is a bright blue star. In fact it is almost a twin of Vega down to its rapid spin. The biggest difference is that we are looking at the equator of Altair more or less (while we see Vega's pole), so where Vega was brighter from our point of view than average, Altair is fainter. Altair is one of the few stars for which we have made a direct image using optical interferometers. It is also by far the smallest in angular size. Not surprisingly Altair is quite squished, as Vega is, but in the case of Altair our viewpoint is favourable actually to see the distortion. For Vega we can only infer the shape.
Here is a photo of the Eagle (Aquila) from tonight with Altair as the eye of the bird near the top of the image (just to the left of the word "Altair"). It is a 30-second exposure with an five-year-old digital camera.
Aquila (the Eagle) with Altair labeled |
Here is a photo of Jupiter and the Galilean moons (from left to right: Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto) taken a couple of minutes earlier. The planet Uranus is the blue stripe in top-left corner.
Jupiter and the Galilean Satellites with Uranus at Top Left |
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Vega
Eighteen years and a month ago I spent a few weeks on a mountain in Armenia near the points where Iran, Armenia and Azerbaijan meet. I was there with a group of astronomers from the Pulkovo observatory in St. Petersburg to observe spectrophotometric standard stars. I would swing the telescope from α Aquilae to α Lyrae who straddle either side of Cygnus, the swan. We looked at other stars that I can no longer remember. The common name for α Lyrae is, of course, Vega, and Vega is the ultimate standard star that forms the basis for astronomical measurements at least in the optical and nearby. The apparent brightness of other stars is compared to Vega, so Vega is an especially well-studied star.
View Larger Map
Vega is one of the brighest stars in the northern sky and from Vancouver where I'm sitting, it is visible most nights -- a blue-white beacon in sky. Vega is about twice the mass of the Sun, so it should be about 20 times brighter when in fact it appears to be nearly sixty times brighter than the Sun, much brighter than other stars of its mass; Sirius for example is 25 times brighter than the Sun. This presented quite a puzzle until it was discovered that Vega is rotating once every 12 hours or so. If you looked at the star from the side, it is squished like a melon --- if it rotated just a bit faster, material would fly off of its equator. We are looking down on the pole of Vega so it is difficult to measure the rotation velocity, but because the pole is closer to the centre of the star, the gravity at the pole is stronger. It turns out for a particular star, regions where the gravity is stronger put out more light, so from our point of view Vega is about 50% brighter than averaged over the surface. The rapid rotation makes Vega somewhat brighter than a similar slowly rotating star from every direction.
View Larger Map
Vega is one of the brighest stars in the northern sky and from Vancouver where I'm sitting, it is visible most nights -- a blue-white beacon in sky. Vega is about twice the mass of the Sun, so it should be about 20 times brighter when in fact it appears to be nearly sixty times brighter than the Sun, much brighter than other stars of its mass; Sirius for example is 25 times brighter than the Sun. This presented quite a puzzle until it was discovered that Vega is rotating once every 12 hours or so. If you looked at the star from the side, it is squished like a melon --- if it rotated just a bit faster, material would fly off of its equator. We are looking down on the pole of Vega so it is difficult to measure the rotation velocity, but because the pole is closer to the centre of the star, the gravity at the pole is stronger. It turns out for a particular star, regions where the gravity is stronger put out more light, so from our point of view Vega is about 50% brighter than averaged over the surface. The rapid rotation makes Vega somewhat brighter than a similar slowly rotating star from every direction.
Gliese 581
Gliese 581 is a red dwarf star about twenty light years from Earth in the constellation Libra. It is about one hundred time fainter than the faintest stars that we can see with our eyes and about one third the mass of the sun. So what makes it special? It turns out that Gliese 581 has six (and counting) planets in orbit around it. Last to be discovered, Gliese 581g, is at just the right distance from the star so that its surface temperature would allow liquid water, presumably one of the prerequisites for life. It turns out that this planet is quite interesting. Its rotation is tidally locked with its orbit, so as one side of the Moon always faces the Earth, one side of the planet always faces its star. The most comfortable place to live would been along the terminator between night and day.
The planet orbits the star every 37 days at a distance seven times closer than the Earth is to the Sun. The mass of the planet is three to four times that of Earth, so astronomers guess that it may have an atmosphere with temperatures ranging from -32C on the night side to 71C on the day side.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5733 The Lick-Carnegie Exoplanet Survey: A 3.1 M_Earth Planet in the Habitable Zone of the Nearby M3V Star Gliese 581
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_16212943 UCSC astronomer, others discover first habitable planet outside our system
The planet orbits the star every 37 days at a distance seven times closer than the Earth is to the Sun. The mass of the planet is three to four times that of Earth, so astronomers guess that it may have an atmosphere with temperatures ranging from -32C on the night side to 71C on the day side.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5733 The Lick-Carnegie Exoplanet Survey: A 3.1 M_Earth Planet in the Habitable Zone of the Nearby M3V Star Gliese 581
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_16212943 UCSC astronomer, others discover first habitable planet outside our system
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Procyon
Canis Minor with Procyon at the Bottom |
The MOST satellite watched Procyon for a month in 2004 and contrary to expectations did not find oscillations it in flux. Many stars including Procyon are thought to have convection regions within (thinking the roiling of the boiling pot of water). The roiling motion causes the brightness of the star to vary slightly. Astronomers thought that the variation would be strong enough to be see with MOST but it wasn't. This was somewhat surprising and is still not well understood.
Monday, September 27, 2010
Sirius
Canis Major and Canis Minor |
Sirius is actually two blue-white stars in orbit around each other. The brighter is a main sequence star about twice as massive as the sun. The fainter is a white dwarf star about as massive as the Sun but with the radius of the Earth. Sirius B presented a great problem for physics that was only solved by quantum mechanics, nearly a century after its discovery. Sirius A and B are two of the eight closest stars to the Sun, so white dwarfs clearly a common in the sky which only made the problem more frustrating. Although Sirius B is much fainter in the optical, it dramatically outshines Sirius A in the x-rays. And there is possibly a habitable zone for planets that orbit around both stars but no potential Tatooines have been discovered.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Arcturus
Arcturus Setting just above the Trees |
This got me thinking about all of the stars like Arcturus and further evolved in the bulge of our Galaxy. These are the sources for surveys of gravitational microlensing such as OGLE. How would they appear if we observed a microlensing event in the radio? It turns out that about eight percent of the OGLE-2 sources could be detected by a planned radio telescope called the Square Kilometer Array, and if the lens had a small enough mass, the radio flux would oscillate as the lens passed in front of the source, telling us the mass of the lens. Pretty neat! If you want to learn more, read http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3007.
Of course, being the brightest star in the northern half of the sky, there are lots of stories about Arcturus from how its light opened the world's fair in Chicago to various myths. The one that I found most interesting is how the declination of Arcturus is the latitude of the island of Hawaii, so when you are at the latitude of Hawaii, Arcturus passes directly overhead. The Polynesians would sail northward from Tahiti and the Marquesas islands until Arcturus was directly overhead at its highest point and then sail west until they landed at Hawaii. They called it Hōkūleʻa, the "Star of Joy", so when you look at Arcturus, you can imagine it at the zenith above a beach on Hawaii, and you too will feel the joy. By the way, the Polynesians used Sirius for the return trip.
Each Star is a World
When I was growing up, I became interested in astronomy by looking at the night sky. Fortunately, where I lived I could see many stars, and I learned their names and a bit about each of them. I recently found a book, The Hundred Greatest Stars, that gives a lot of information about 100 stars, but many of these stars are too faint to be seen. I wanted to collect information about the stars that anyone familiar with the night sky knows. Something like The Friendly Stars but of course updated with the modern information. We know so much more about the bright stars of the night sky than Ms. Martin could write about at the turn of last century, so here goes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)